For many years I had heard stories about the "Hundredth Monkey
phenomenon" and was fascinated with the possibility that there might be
some sort of collective consciousness that we could tap into to decrease crime, eliminate wars, and
generally unite as a single species. In the 1992 presidential election, in
fact, one candidate—Dr. John Hagelin from the Natural Law Party—claimed that if elected he would implement a plan that would solve
the problems of our inner cities: meditation. Hagelin and others (especially
proponents of Transcendental Meditation, or TM) believe that thought can somehow be transferred between people, especially people
in a meditative state; if enough people meditate at the same time, some sort of
critical mass will be reached, thereby inducing significant planetary change. The Hundredth Monkey phenomenon is
commonly cited as empirical proof of this astonishing theory. In the 1950s, so
the story goes, Japanese scientists gave monkeys on Koshima Island potatoes. One day one of the monkeys learned to wash
the potatoes and then taught the skill to others. When about one hundred
monkeys had learned the skill—the so-called critical mass —suddenly all the monkeys knew it, even those on other islands
hundreds of miles away. Books about the phenomenon have spread this theory
widely in New Age circles. Lyall Watson's Lifetide (1979) and Ken Keyes's The Hundredth Monkey (1982), for example, have been
through multiple printings and sold millions of copies; Elda Hartley even made
a film called The Hundredth Monkey.
As an exercise in skepticism, start by asking whether events really
happened as reported. They did not. In 1952, primatologists began providing
Japanese macaques with sweet potatoes to keep the
monkeys from raiding local farms. One monkey did learn to wash dirt
off the sweet potatoes in a stream or the ocean, and other monkeys did learn to
imitate the behavior. Now let's examine Watson's book more carefully. He admits that "one has to gather the rest
of the story from personal anecdotes and bits of folklore among primate
researchers, because most of them are still not quite sure what happened. So I am forced to improvise the details." Watson then
speculates that "an unspecified number of monkeys on Koshima were washing
sweet potatoes in the sea"—hardly the level of precision one expects. He then makes this statement: "Let us say, for
argument's sake, that the number was ninety-nine and that at 11:00 A.M. on a
Tuesday, one further convert was added to the fold in the usual way. But the addition of the hundredth monkey apparently carried the
number across some sort of threshold, pushing it through a kind of critical
mass." At this point, says Watson, the habit "seems to have jumped natural barriers and to have appeared spontaneously on other
islands" (1979, pp. 2-8).
Let's stop right there. Scientists do not "improvise"
details or make wild guesses from "anecdotes" and "bits of
folklore." In fact, some scientists did record exactly what happened (for
example, Baldwin et al. 1980; Imanishi 1983; Kawai 1962). The research began with a
troop of twenty monkeys in 1952, and every monkey on the island was carefully
observed. By 1962, the troop had increased to fiftynine monkeys and exactly thirty-six of the fifty-nine monkeys were
washing their sweet potatoes. The "sudden" acquisition of the
behavior actually took ten years, and the "hundred monkeys" were
actually only thirty-six in 1962. Furthermore, we can speculate endlessly
about what the monkeys knew, but the fact remains that not all of the monkeys
in the troop were exhibiting the washing behavior. The thirtysix monkeys were not a critical mass even at home. And while there are
some reports of similar behavior on other islands, the observations were made
between 1953 and 1967. It was not sudden, nor was it necessarily connected to Koshima. The monkeys on other
islands could have discovered this simple skill themselves, for example, or
inhabitants on other islands might have taught them. In any case, not only is there no evidence to support this extraordinary
claim, there is not even a real phenomenon to explain.
- From Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time / Michael Shermer; Henry Holt and company New York
Better by far you forget and smile than you should remember and be sad - Christina Rosetti